Διερεύνηση της αυτο-αξιολόγησης των μαθησιακών αποτελεσμάτων της Ενότητας της ΔΜΥ 51 του ΜΠΣ Διοίκηση Μονάδων Υγείας του ΕΑΠ


Published: Dec 21, 2017
Keywords:
self-assessment learning outcome quality educational work
Maria MALLIAROU
Pavlos Sarafis
Dimitris Paliouras
Athanasios Nikolentzos
Agoritsa Varaklioti
Filippos Domager
Efi Mourtou
Kostantia Ladopoulou
Evelina Pappa
Ioannis Vlassis
Maria Trigoni
Aggelos Papadopoulos
Panagiotis Bamidis
Abstract
Introduction: A self- assessment of learning outcomes was selected to explore the level of apprehension of educational work by students of module MHS 51 of the postgraduate program of Management of Health services of Hellenic Open University. Aim: Investigation of self-assessment of learning outcomes for module MHS 51 of the postgraduate program of Management of Health services of Hellenic Open University and its correlation to the results of the final examination. Methodology: The sample of the study consisted of 99 Postgraduate students from module MHS 51 (response rate: 24%) who were asked to fill out an online questionnaire which was sent to their personal e-mail created for the purpose of the study. All necessary measures were taken to ensure confidentiality and that the identity of the participants would not be revealed. The questionnaire was investigating if the students after the study of the module were able to define, describe and determine concepts acquired during the module and to identify their differences and  the answers were given at a 6 level likert scale with 1 to correspond to totally disagree and 6 to totally agree. The results were analyzed using the SPSS 21 statistical package. Results: The students assessed that they had obtained an average of 76.93% of the knowledge of the module. In over 50% of 107 items of the scale students answered that they agree and totally agree, that after attending and studying the module had mastered the specific knowledge they were offered. Comparing the students’ selfassessment results with their respective final score in the exam, it is clear that students who assessed themselves with “low knowledge gained” received a low score in the module, while students who assessed themselves highly, received high scores in the final examinations of the module. Conclusions: Self-assessment is a method that can be used by students to assess learning outcomes of the module and by the teachers to relate the assessment’s results to final exams and to use it as a quality measure of the educational work offered to the students in module MHS 51.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Editorial
Author Biographies
Maria MALLIAROU, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Pavlos Sarafis, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Dimitris Paliouras, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Athanasios Nikolentzos, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Agoritsa Varaklioti, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Filippos Domager, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Efi Mourtou, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Kostantia Ladopoulou, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Evelina Pappa, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Ioannis Vlassis, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Maria Trigoni, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Aggelos Papadopoulos, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

Panagiotis Bamidis, ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ

ΣΕΠ/ΕΑΠ

ΔΜΥ

References
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–67.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00138746
Butcher, A.C., Stefani, L.J. (1995). Analysis of peer, self- and staff assessment in group project work. Assessment in Education, 2, 165–86.
Dearnley, C.A., Meddings, F.S. (2007). Student self-assessment and its impact on learning – A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today, 27, 333–40.
Gallien, T., & Oomen-Early, J. (2008). Personalized versus collective instructor feedback in the online courseroom: Does type of feedback affect student satisfaction, academic performance and perceived connectedness with the instructor? International Journal of E-Learning, 7(3), 463-476.
Jung, C., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
Killic, D. (2016). An examination of using self-, peer-, and teacher assessment in higher education: a case study in teacher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 136-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n1p136
Kruidering-Hall, M., O'Sullivan, P.S., Chou, C.L. (2009). Teaching feedback to first-year medical students: long-term skill retention and accuracy of student self-assessment. J Gen Intern Med, 24(6), 721-6.
McMahon, T. (1999). Using negotiation in summative assessment to encourage critical thinking. Teaching in Higher Education, 4, 549–54.
Rowntree, D. (1988) Educational Technology in Curriculum Development. London: Paul Chapman.
Shea, P., Swan, K., Fredericksen, E., & Pickett, A. (2002). Student satisfaction and reported learning in the SUNY learning network. In J. Bourne & J.C. Moore (Eds.), Quality online education, 3, 145-155. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 221–33.
Stefani, L.J. (1998). Assessment in partnership with learners. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education for Health, 23, 339–50.
Stein, D. (2004). Student satisfaction depends on course structure. Online Classroom,
Thorpe, M. (1993) Evaluating open and distance learning (2nd ed.) (Harlow, Longman)
Tricker, T., Rangecroft, M., Long, P., & Gilroy, P. (2001). Evaluating distance education courses: The student perception. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 165-177.