Using ecosystem simulation models to teach about the ‘resilient nature’ / Χρησιμοποιώντας μοντέλα προσομοίωσης οικοσυστημάτων για τη διδασκαλία της «ελαστικής» φύσης


Published: Dec 21, 2017
Keywords:
Ecosystems’ models model-based learning resilient nature balanced nature ecology teaching and learning
Georgios Ampatzidis
Marida Ergazaki
Abstract

This paper is concerned with the NetLogo models we developed in order to simulate possible trajectories of disturbed/protected ecosystems according to findings of current ecological research. The four models we present here were integrated in a learning environment aimed at supporting non-biology major students in (a) substituting the idea of the ‘balanced nature’ with the currently valid idea of the ‘resilient nature’ and thus constructing an up-to-date understanding on ecosystems’ function, and (b) using this understanding to advance systems thinking skills. Each model has two versions concerning two different trajectories of the ecosystem with specific initial conditions or features of the recovery plan. In our case studies, students explored in triads the ecosystem models with the aid of worksheets, which required predictions about the ecosystem’s behaviour before using the model and explanations afterwards. Half of students’ triads explored the 1st version of each model while the other half explored the 2nd one. At the end of each session, the two different trajectories simulated by each model were discussed with the whole class to enhance the emergence of the idea of contingency. Our results about the effectiveness of the final version of the learning environment were promising and are reported elsewhere.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Editorial
Author Biographies
Georgios Ampatzidis, University of Thessaly
Adjunct Lecturer, Department of Primary Education
Marida Ergazaki, University of Patras
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education
References
Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2014). Towards a learning environment for challenging the idea of the balanced nature: Insights from the first cycle of research. In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiou (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research For Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning. Part 3 (pp. 44–54). Nicosia, Cyprus: European Science Education Research Association.
Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2016). Can the idea of “Balance of Nature” be effectively challenged within a model-based learning environment? Insights from the second cycle of developmental research. In T. Tal & A. Yarden (Eds.), The Future of Biology Education Research (pp. 7–20). Haifa, Israel: ERIDOB.
Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2017). Using ecology to enhance everyday reasoning: the case of interdependent and reciprocal causality. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 11(1), 93–104.
Ampatzidis, G. & Ergazaki, M. (in preparation). Challenging the idea of the ‘Balance of Nature’ through promoting ecosystems’ contingency: the 'Bifurcated Domino Path' teaching-learning strategy.
Boersma, K., Waarlo, A. J., & Klaassen, K. (2011). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology education. Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 190–197.
Cooper, G. (2001). Must There Be a Balance of Nature? Biology and Philosophy, 16(4), 481–506.
Cuddington, K. (2001). The “Balance of Nature” Metaphor and Equilibrium in Population Ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 16(4), 463–479.
Ergazaki, M., & Ampatzidis, G. (2012). Students’ Reasoning about the Future of Disturbed or Protected Ecosystems & the Idea of the “Balance of Nature.” Research in Science Education, 42(3), 511–530.
Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2008). Exploring lake ecology in a computer-supported learning environment. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 90–94.
Gunderson, L. H., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2010). Foundations of Ecological Resilience. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.
Jelinski, D. E. (2005). There is no mother nature-there is no balance of nature: culture, ecology and conservation. Human Ecology, 33(2), 276–285.
Ladle, R. J., & Gillson, L. (2009). The (im)balance of nature: a public perception time-lag? Public Understanding of Science, 18(2), 229–242.
Richmond, B. (2004). An Introduction to Systems Thinking. Lebanon, NH: isee systems.
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.
Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical Transitions in Nature and Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schmitz, O. (2010). Resolving Ecosystem Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Westra, R. (2008). Learning and teaching ecosystem behaviour in secondary education. Castricum, Netherlands: Faculteit Betawetenschappen.