ICODL

Facilitating learning and promoting active participation and interaction in online university courses during the Covid 19 era: Views of AUTH undergraduate students

PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: Ιαν 22, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/icodl.3418
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
ενεργητική συμμετοχή αλληλεπίδραση συνεργατικά και επικοινωνιακά εργαλεία σύγχρονη διαδικτυακή μάθηση
Μαρία (ΜARIA) Παυλή Κορρέ (PAVLIS KORRES)
Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης Ελληνικό Ανοικτό Πανεπιστήμιο
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6390-4013
Περίληψη

The mandatory transition from face-to-face learning to e-learning due to Covid 19 pandemic and the adaptation of teachers and students to the learning conditions presented a new and great challenge. The present paper is focusing on the design of an undergraduate course in the School of Early Childhood Education of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, implemented during the spring semester of 2021 using the zoom platform. The paper presents the views of the participants in the course concerning the facilitation of their learning, their active participation and the interaction and collaboration developed by the exploitation of multimedia as well as communication and collaboration tools. The views of the students were recorded systematically throughout the semester in the context of formative evaluation carried out and were analyzed by thematic analysis. According to the results of the research, the students have confirmed that the exploitation of multimedia and communication and collaboration tools contributed effectively to their learning, to their active participation and the development of different types of interaction (with the content, with the teacher and between themselves). Interactive posts on padlets, projections and comments on videos, polls, and chat were considered the most effective means and tools.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Οι συγγραφείς των άρθρων που δημοσιεύονται στα πρακτικά του συνεδρίου για την Ανοικτή και εξ Αποστάσεως Εκπαίδευση διατηρούν τα δικαιώματα πνευματικής ιδιοκτησίας επί των άρθρων τους. Άρθρα που δημοσιεύονται στα πρακτικά διατίθενται με άδεια Creative Commons 4.0 και σύμφωνα με την άδεια μπορούν να χρησιμοποιούνται ελεύθερα, με αναφορά στο/στη συγγραφέα και στην πρώτη δημοσίευση για μη κερδοσκοπικούς σκοπούς και με δικαίωμα τροποποίησης μόνον με παρόμοια διανομή (αν αναμείξετε, τροποποιήσετε, ή δημιουργήσετε πάνω στο υλικό, πρέπει να διανείμετε τις δικές σας συνεισφορές υπό την ίδια άδεια όπως και το πρωτότυπο).
Βιογραφικό Συγγραφέα
Μαρία (ΜARIA) Παυλή Κορρέ (PAVLIS KORRES), Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης Ελληνικό Ανοικτό Πανεπιστήμιο

Αναπληρώτρια Καθηγήτρια ΤΕΠΑΕ, ΑΠΘ

Μέλος ΣΕΠ ΕΑΠ στο ΜΠΣ "Εκπαίδευση Ενηλίκων", Συντονίστρια ΕΚΕ51

Αναφορές
Baggaley, J. (2009). Level of Media Interactivity. In S. Mishra (Ed.), E-learning (pp.32- 41). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Bell, J. (1997). Μεθοδολογικός Σχεδιασμός Παιδαγωγικής και Κοινωνικής Έρευνας. Αθήνα: Gutenberg.
Brookfield, S.D.P., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Burden, K. (2009). Online Video. In S. Mishra (Ed.), E-learning (pp.69- 75). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Γαλατά, Π. Β., Βεργίδης, Δ., Δακοπούλου, Α., Καλογρίδη, Σ., Κεδράκα, Κ., & Τσιμπουκλή, Α. (2017). Η διεξαγωγή της έρευνας στην Εκπαίδευση Ενηλίκων. Πάτρα: ΕΑΠ.
Chen, W., & You, M. (2007). The differences between the influences of synchronous and asynchronous modes on collaborative learning project of industrial design. In D. Schuler (Ed.), Online communities and social computing (pp. 275–283). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Claus, T., & Changchit, C. (2017). Technology-Infused Education: The Influence of Course Environment Factors. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Exploring the New Era of Technology-Infused Education (pp. 230-240). USA: IGI-GLOBAL.
Copper, J. M., & Semich, G. (2014). Youtube as a teacher training tool: Information and communication technology as a delivery instrument for professional development. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 10(4), 30–40. doi:10.4018/ijicte.2014100103
Dawley, L. (2007). The Tools for Successful Online Teaching. USA: Information Science Publishing.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-Based Training: Creating E-Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Driver, M. (2002). Exploring student perceptions of group interaction and class satisfaction in the web-enhanced classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 5.
Duemer, L., Fontenot, D., Gumfory, K., Kallus, M., Larsen, J., Schafer, S., & Shaw, Jr., B. (2002). The use of synchronous discussion groups to enhance community formation and professional identity development. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2). Ανακτήθηκε από http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/viewarticle.cfm?volID=1&IssueID=3&ArticleID=59
Gillies, D. (2008). Student Perspectives on Videoconferencing in Teacher Education at a Distance. Distance Education, 29(1), 107-118. doi: 10.1080/01587910802004878
Grieve, R., Moffitt, R. L., & Padgett, C. R. (2018). Student Perceptions of Marker Personality and Intelligence: The Effect of Emoticons in Online Assignment Feedback. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 232-238. Ανακτήθηκε από https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.008
Guy, R. S. (2007). The Role of Interaction in e-Learning. In N. A. Buzzetto-More (Ed.), Principles of Effective Online Teaching (pp. 85-105). California: Informing Science Press.
Heafner, J. (2000). Opinion: The Importance of Being Synchronous. Academic Writing. Ανακτήθηκε από https://wac.colostate.edu/aw/teaching/haefner2000.htm
Hills, A. L. (2005, October). Social Presence and Communication Quality in Videoconferencing (Dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce with Honours). Ανακτήθηκε από http://hdl.handle.net/10523/1183
Hong, K. (2002). Relationships between students’ and instructional variables with satisfaction learning from a Web-based course. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 267–281. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00105-7
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning: A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. Ανακτήθηκε από http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0848.pdf
Hrastinski, S. (2010). How do e-learners participate in synchronous online discussions? Evolutionary and social psychological perspectives. In N. Kock (Ed.), Evolutionary Psychology and Information Systems Research, Integrated Series in InformationSystems, 24, 119–147.
Huang, A. H., Yen, D. C., & Zhang, X. (2008). Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Information & Management, 45, 466-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.07.001
Idrus, R. M., & Hussain, R. M.B. R. (2009). Interactive Whiteboard. In S. Mishra (Ed.), E-learning (pp. 128-131). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Jibril, T. A., & Abdullah, M. H. (2013). Relevance of Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication Contexts: An Overview. Asian Social Science; 9(4), 201-207. ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025
Judge, G. (1999). The production and use of on-line web quizzes for economics, Computers in Higher Education Economics Review, 13(1) Ανακτήθηκε από http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk//cheer/ch13_1/ch13_1p21.htm
Kang, M., & Imt, T. (2013). Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 292–301. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12005
Keller, C., & Hrastinski, S. (2007). Do Learning Styles Matter in Online Education. In N. A. Buzzetto-More (Ed.), Principles of Effective Online Teaching, (pp.123-136). California: Informing Science Press.
Kim, K. J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 335-344.
Knowles, M. (1991). Using Learning Contracts. San Francisco: Jossey – Bass Publishers.
Literacy Information and Communication System (LINCS). (2011). Using video in teaching and staff development. Literacy Information and Communication System. Ανακτήθηκε από https://lincs.ed.gov/lincs/discussions/professionaldevelopment/11videopart1_summary
Lo, S. K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(5), 595-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132
Mishra, S. (2009a). Designing online learning. In S. Mishra (Ed.), E-learning (pp. 28-35). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Mishra, S. (2009b). Web Surveys and Quizzes. In S. Mishra (Ed.), E-learning (pp.131- 133). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Mishra, P., & Laeeq Khan, M. (2009). Webcasting. In S. Mishra (Ed.), E-learning (pp. 84-87). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In Μ. G. Moore (Ed.) Handbook of distance education. (pp. 89-103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moore, M. G. (2019). The Theory of Transactional Distance. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 32-46). New York: Routledge.
Mutalib, M.A., Halim, N.D., & Yahaya, N. (2016). Meta-analysis on Interaction in Online Learning. Ανακτήθηκε από https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Meta-analysis-on-Interaction-in-Online-Learning-Mutalib-Halim/1647b4ba14260089900ab06291cd5a76a153db45
Naidu, S. (2009). Pedagogical affordances of Technology, In SANJAYA MISHRA (Ed.), E-learning (pp. 4-13). New Delhi: STRIDE, IGNOU.
Νoyé, D., & Piveteau, J. (1997). Guide pratique du formateur. INSEP Editions.
Osterman, P. (2016). Video Conference as a Tool for Enhancing Student Collaboration. Polytechnic & Design, 4(4), 395-402.
Oyarzun, B., Stefaniak, J., Bol, L., &Morrison, G.R. (2018). Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement, and satisfaction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 154-175.
Park, Y.J., & Bonk, C. J. (2007a). Synchronous Learning Experiences: Distance and Residential Learners’ Perspectives in a Blended Graduate Course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 245-264.
Park, Y. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2007b). Is Online Life a Breeze? A Case Study for Promoting Synchronous Learning in a Blended Graduate Course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 307-323.
Pavlis Korres, M. (2012). The Role of the Communication Tools in the Development of the Learning Group in an Online Environment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(6), 1360-1365.
Pavlis-Korres, M., & Leftheriotou, P. (2016). Building Interaction in Adults' Online Courses: A Case Study on Training E-Educators of Adutls. In Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E. & Agyeman, C., Handbook of Research on Strategic Management of Interaction, Presence and Participation in Online Courses (pp. 185-215). USA: IGI-Global.
Παυλή Κορρέ, Μ. (2020). Σχεδιασμός Προγραμμάτων Ηλεκτρονικής Μάθησης. Στο Μ. Παυλή Κορρέ & Π. Λευθεριώτου, Σχεδιασμός Διά Ζώσης και Ηλεκτρονικών Προγραμμάτων μη Τυπικής Εκπαίδευσης (σσ. 129-206). Ενηλίκων Αθήνα: Ύψιλον.
Pavlis Korres, M. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Online Experience: Best educational practices unveiled by the mouse in the presence of a cat. In L. Kyei-Blankson, E. Ntuli, & J. Blankson (Eds.), Revealing Inequities in Online Education During Global Crises (pp. 420-446). USA: IGI-GLOBAL.
Pelowski, S., Frissell, L., Cabral, K., & Yu, T. (2005). So far but yet so close: Student chat room immediacy, learning, and performance in an online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16, 395–407.
Picciano, A.G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediated communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 581-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493102321018222
Rogers, A. (2007). Teaching Adults. GB (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
Rovai, A. (2002). Building Sense of Community at a Distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1). Ανακτήθηκε από http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/153
Rovai, A.P., Wighting, M.J., & Lucking, R. (2004). The classroom and school community inventory: Development, refinement, and validation of a self-report measure for educational research. Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 263-280.
Schutt, M., Allen, B.S., & Laumakis, M.A. (2009). The Effects of Instructor Immediacy Behaviors in Online Learning Environments. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 135-148.
Semich, G., & Copper, J. (2017). Instructional Videos as ICT for Teacher Professional Development: Transitioning from the Traditional Classroom to YouTube. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Exploring the New Era of Technology-Infused Education (pp. 317-331). USA: IGI-Global.
Skylar, A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69–84.
SMART Technologies (2006). The Interactive Whiteboard in Education. Διαθέσιμο στη διεύθυνση http://www2.smarttech.com/NR/rdonlyres/2C729F6E-0A8D-42B8-9B32- F90BE0A746D8/0/Int_Whiteboard_ Research_Whitepaper_Update.pdf
Smyth, R. (2005). Broadband Videoconferencing as a Tool for Learner-Centered Distance Learning in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 805-820.
Tawfik, Andrew A., Giabbanelli, Philippe J., Hogan, Maureen, Msilu, Fortunata, Gill, Anila, & York, Cindy S. (2018). Effects of success v failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Computers & Education, 118, 120-132.
Thurmond, V., Wambach, K. (2004). Understanding Interaction in Distance Education, A review of the literature, International Journal of instructional Technology & Distance Learning, [On-line]. Available http://www.itdl.org/journal/Jan_04/article02.htm
Twigg, C. (2003). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: New Models for Online Learning. Educause review. September/October, 28-38.
Walther, J.B., & D’ Addario, K.P. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), Fall 2001 324-347
Wang, Y., & Chen, N. (2007). Online synchronous language learning: SLMS over the Internet. Innovate, 3(3). Ανακτήθηκε από http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=337
Wei, A.C.Y. (2012). Emoticons and the non-verbal communication: With reference to Facebook (Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Media Studies, Christ University, Bangalore – India).
Wetzel, D.R. (2009). 6 Interactive White Board Strategies in Science: Integration Techniques of Web-Based Resources for Engaging Students. Ανακτήθηκε από http://teachingtechnology. suite101.com/article.cfm/6_interactive_white_boards_ strategies_in_science
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.