ICT and specific learning disabilities: A proposition for the use of the software Rewordify in the foreign language learning by students with reading comprehension difficulties


Δημοσιευμένα: Φεβ 10, 2020
Panagiota Athanasiadou
Georgia Andreou
Eleni Gana
Περίληψη

During the past few years, there has been a growing interest in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in education. ICT has become more and more prominent in classrooms in any possible way, enabling teachers to make their lessons more interesting and effective. Furthermore, a number of studies has been focusing on the use of technology in accommodating the needs of students with special educational needs and especially of those with specific learning disabilities. It is widely accepted that technology can help those students cope with the material that troubles them. Technology becomes even more useful when we refer to foreign language learning on the part of students with specific learning disabilities, a process that entails additional difficulties for them. English, which is the first foreign language taught to students in the Greek educational system, is a phonologically non-transparent language, a fact that causes severe difficulties to students with specific learning disabilities especially in the domain of decoding and reading comprehension. In the current article, a brief review of the use of technology in education and especially in special education will be attempted. Then, there will be a presentation of the problems faced by students with specific learning disabilities in reading comprehension in English as a foreign language. Finally, a free educational software named Rewordify will be presented. We will discuss its function and propose ways of using it in classroom for accommodating the needs of students with specific learning disabilities in reading comprehension in English. Potential limitations will also be discussed.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Άρθρα
Βιογραφικό Συγγραφέα
Panagiota Athanasiadou, Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλίας

Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα Ειδικής Αγωγής- Υποψήφια Διδάκτωρ

Αναφορές
Allsopp, D. H., Colucci, K., Doone, E., Perez, L., Bryant Jr, E., & Holhfeld, T. N.
(2012). Interactive whiteboard technology for students with disabilities: A year long exploratory study. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700401
Andreou, G., & Baseki, J. (2012). Phonological and spelling mistakes among dyslexic
and non-dyslexic children learning two different languages: Greek vs English. Psychology, 3(8), 595-600. Doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.38089
Αndreou, G., & Segklia, M. (2017). Learning difficulties in first and second language:
Preliminary results from a cross-linguistic skills transfer. English Linguistics Research,
(3), 62-71. Doi:10.5430/elr.v6n3p62
Andreou, G., Athanasiadou, P., & Tzivinikou, S. (2019). Accommodations on
reading comprehension assessment for students with learning disabilities: A review study. Psychology 10(04):521-538. Doi: 10.4236/psych.2019.104034
Balasubramanian, K., Jaykumar, V., & Fukey, L. N. (2014). A study on “Student
preference towards the use of Edmodo as a learning platform to create responsible learning environment”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 144, 416-422. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.311
Cakir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visual material in foreign language
teaching classroom. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(4), 67-72. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102619
Chung, K. K. H., & Ho, C. S. H. (2010). Second language learning difficulties in
Chinese children with dyslexia: What are the reading-related cognitive skills that contribute to English and Chinese word reading?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409345018
Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student
learning. Arkansas Tech University.
De León Rodríguez, D., Buetler, K. A., Eggenberger, N., Laganaro, M., Nyffeler,
T., Annoni, J. M., & Müri, R. M. (2016). The Impact of Language Opacity and Proficiency on Reading Strategies in Bilinguals: An Eye Movement Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 649. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00649
Dermitzaki, I., Andreou, G., & Paraskeva, V. (2008). High and Low Reading
Comprehension Achievers’ Strategic Behavior and Its Relation to Performance in Reading Comprehension. Reading Psychology, 29, 471-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802168519
Dolan, R. P., Hall, T. E., Banerjee, M., Chun, E., & Strangman, N. (2005). Applying
Principals of Universal Design to Test Delivery: The Effect of Computer-Based read Aloud on Test Performance of High School Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4, 4-32. https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/issue/archive
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading
comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Eady, M., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: Technology and
teaching. Learning to teach in the primary school, 71. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1413&context=asdpapers
Ellis, N. C., & Hooper, A. M. (2001). Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched
tests. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 571-599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716401004052
Engstrom, E. U. (2005). Reading, writing, and assistive technology: An integrated
developmental curriculum for college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(1), 30-39. Retrieved from https://www.pioneerschools.org/cms/lib/NY19000288/Centricity/Domain/125/AT_reading_and_writing.pdf
Fisher, M., & Baird, D. E. (2005). Online learning design that fosters student support,
self-regulation, and retention. Campus-wide information systems, 22(2), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510587100
Floyd, K. K., & Judge, S. L. (2012). The Efficacy of Assistive
Technology on
Reading Comprehension for Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8, 48-64. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/114207/.
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness‐to‐
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading
comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of educational research, 71(2), 279-320. Doi: 10.3102/00346543071002279
Helland, T., & Kaasa, R. (2005). Dyslexia in English as s Second Language.
Dyslexia, 11, 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.286
Jaffri, H., & Talib, R. (2017). Using Gamification to Increase Students’ Motivation:
Our Experience in Teaching Research Methodology Class. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the scholarship of teaching and learning, 4th – 5th April 2017 (p. 53-61). UUM EDC Hotels & Resorts, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.
Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on
instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137-146. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-010-9150-8
Kleiman, G. (2000). Myths and Realities About Technology in K-12 Schools
Only a clear-eyed commitment to using technology to help meet central educational goals will enable us to get a substantial return on our investment. LNT Perspectives: The Online Journal of the Leadership and the New Technologies Community 14, 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/educ260/documents/myths.pdf
Kuhn, M., Schwanenflugel, P., & Meisinger, E. (2010). Aligning Theory and
Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency. Reading Research Quality, 45, 232-253. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
Lange, A. A., McPhillips, M., Mulhern, G., & Wylie, J. (2006). Assistive Software
Tools for Secondary-Level Students with Literacy Difficulties. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100302
Lucia, S. (2001). E-books and their future in academic libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (7). Doi: 10.1045/july2001-snowhill
Menezes, H. (2012). Using Digital Storytelling to Improve Literacy
Skills. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading
comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519. Retrieved from http://www.eduplace.com/state/author/pik_chard_fluency.pdf
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part 1. On the Horizon, 9
Riga, A., Andreou, G. & Anastassiou, F. (2017). Enhancing the language literacy
skills of children with Specific Learning Difficulties; a review on the use of technology and the application of innovative teaching methods. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 13-18. doi: 10.19044/ejes.v4no3a2
Schneider, C., Gong, B., & Egan, K. (2016). Testing Accommodations for Students
with Dyslexia: Key Opportunities to Understand Student Thinking . Retrieved
from
Schugar, H. R., Smith, C. A., & Schugar, J. T. (2013). Teaching with interactive
picture e‐books in grades K–6. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 615-624. Doi:10.1002/TRTR.1168
Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (Specific Reading Disability).
Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.043
Thurlow, M., Lazarus, S., Thompson, S., & Morse, A. B. (2005). State Policies on
Assessment Participation and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 232-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050380040401
Torgesen, J. K. (2006). Recent Discoveries from Research on Remedial Interventions
for Children with Dyslexia. In M. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Wong, K., Liong, C., Lin, Z. X., Lower, M., & Lam, P. (2011). EBooks as teaching
strategy–preliminary investigation. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceeding ASCILITE Hobart, 4th -7th December 2011 (p. 1343-1352).
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory
into Practice, 41, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2