Blended Learning Pedagogical Framework for Conventional Programs of Study in Higher Education

Δημοσιευμένα: Jan 22, 2022
Nikleia Eteokleous

Educational institutions faced and continue to face great challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Decisions needed to be made, new processes were established and actions took place within frightening deadlines, in some cases overnight. The world keeps battling with the ongoing pandemic and the Universities are struggling to decide which mode of delivery to apply for next semester(s). We are at the stage that we need to re-design our courses, meaning that as university instructors we need to see beyond the traditional approach and ‘re-­‐ conceptualize what can be done in multiple delivery modes.  The current paper describes and explains the pedagogical framework that serves as the backbone to guide the re-design of the courses of private university in the Mediterranean Region (Frederick University – FU), intended to be delivered through the BL approach. The proposed framework is based on research evidence and contemporary theoretical and practical approaches to BL in higher education and capitalizes on the expertise gained by Frederick University from its distance learning programs of study.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • A Μέρος
Βιογραφικό Συγγραφέα
Nikleia Eteokleous, Πανεπιστήμιο Frederick

Τμήμα Επιστημών της Αγωγής

Πρόεδρος Επιτροπής Εξ Αποστάσεως Μάθησης 

Συν-ιδρύτρια Ακαδημίας Ρομποτικής 

Πανεπιστήμιο Frederick 

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium.
Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., & Elen, J. (2015). Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning.
Project Report of ALO-­‐ SBO WP2 -­‐ 15.06.2015.
Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world (Vol. 4). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 1-­‐16.
Gedik, N., Kiraz, E., & Ozden, M. Y. (2013). Design of a blended learning environment: Considerations and implementation issues. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1).
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G.Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333– 350). New York, NY:Routledge.
Graham, C.R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J.B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning inhigher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14.
Gudmundsdottir, G.B. & Hathaway, D.M. (2020). "We Always Make It Work": Teachers' Agency in the Time of Crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 239-250. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.
Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33(3), 381-­‐413.
Kerres, M. & Claudia De Witt (2003). A Didactical Framework for the Design of Blended
Learning Arrangements, Journal of Educational Media, 28:2-­‐3, 101-­‐113, Laurillard, D. (2014). Thinking about blended learning A paper for the Thinkers in Residence programme. Brussels: Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Science and Arts.
McGee, P., & Reis, a. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7–22.
Montrieux, H., Vangestel, S., Raes, A., Matthys, P., & Schellens, T. (2014). Blending face-­‐to-­‐ face higher education with web-­‐based lectures: Comparing different didactical intended purposes. Educational Technology & Society.
OECD (2018). Teachers as Designers of Learning Environments: The Importance of Innovative Pedagogies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
Park, C. L., Perry, B., & Edwards, M. (2011). Minimizing attrition: Strategies for assisting students who are at risk of withdrawal.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 37-47. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2010.543769
Skill, T. D., & Young, B. A. (2002). Embracing the hybrid model: Working at the intersections of virtual and physical learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and learning, 2002(92), 23-­‐32.
Song, L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R. & Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved February 15, 2021 from
Stein, J., & Graham, C. (2014). Essentials for Blended Learning. New York: Routledge.
Watson, J. (2008). Blended Learning: The Convergence of Online and Face-­‐to-­‐Face Education. Promising practices in online learning. North American Council for Online Learning. Retrieved August 29th 2018 from­‐ BlendedLearning-­‐lr.pdf
Whitelock, D. & Jelfs, A. (2003). Editorial: Journal of Educational Media Special Issue on Blended Learning. Journal of Educational Media,28(2–3), 99-­‐100.
UNESCO (2020, April 15). COVID-19 Impact on education. Retrieved June 20, 2020 from https://en.unesco. org/covid19/educationresponse
Yen, J. C., & Lee, C. Y. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56(1), 138-­‐145.
Young, J. R. (2002). Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide
between traditional and online instruction. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved August 29th from­‐Teaching-­‐Seeks-­‐to-­‐End/1848