Utilizing Multiple Representations for the Development of Material for Graph Interpretation


Published: Apr 17, 2026
Keywords:
graphs multiple representations teaching material
Marina Tsaousidi
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2708-5927
Anastasios Molohidis
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-8499
Abstract

The development of skills in reading and interpreting graphs is a key component of data literacy, essential for comprehending information accurately and making informed decisions. Literature indicates that students, especially in physics education, face significant challenges in understanding graphs. This study aims to identify and apply effective design principles for the development of educational material that enhances graph interpretation skills among first-grade Lyceum students. The research is based on an extensive literature review and findings from a pilot implementation. Core element of the design is the use of multiple representations.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Προφορικές Ανακοινώσεις
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Μπισδικιάν, Γ. (2000). Μελέτη της εφαρμογής πολυμέσων στη διδασκαλία γραφικών παραστάσεων και φυσικών εννοιών [Διδακτορική διατριβή, Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης]. ΙΚΕΕ. http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/23097
Τσαουσίδη, Μ., & Μολοχίδης, Α. (2024). Σχεδίαση & ανάπτυξη διδακτικής μαθησιακής ακολουθίας για την καλλιέργεια δεξιοτήτων κατανόησης γραφικών παραστάσεων. Στο Πρακτικά 5ο Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο Νέων Ερευνητών και Ερευνητριών στη Διδακτική των Φυσικών Επιστημών και Νέων Τεχνολογιών στην Εκπαίδευση. (Υπό δημοσίευση).
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Araujo, I. S., Veit, E. A., & Moreira, M. A. (2008). Physics students’ performance using computational modelling activities to improve kinematics graphs interpretation. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1128-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.004
Binali, T., Chang, C. H., Chang, Y. J., & Chang, H. Y. (2024). High school and college students’ graph-interpretation competence in scientific and daily contexts of data visualization. Science & Education, 33(3), 763-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00406-3
Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and understanding line graph interpretations using a scoring rubric of organized cited factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9318-8
Bursal, M., & Yetiş, S. (2020). Middle school students’ graph skills and affective states about graphs. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 692-704. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1136
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications. BSCS, Colorado Springs. Ανακτήθηκε στις 25/6/2025, από: https://fremonths.org/ourpages/auto/2008/5/11/1210522036057/bscs5efullreport2006.pdf
Donnelly-Hermosillo, D. F., Gerard, L. F., & Linn, M. C. (2020). Impact of graph technologies in K-12 science and mathematics education. Computers & Education, 146, 103748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103748
Geyer, MA., Kuske-Janßen, W. (2019). Mathematical Representations in Physics Lessons. Στο: G. Pospiech, M. Michelini, B.S. Eylon. (Επιμ.) Mathematics in Physics Education. Springer, Cham. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04627-9_4
Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in science education, 47(2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M., Andrasevic, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2016). Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010106
Kozhevnikov, M., & Thornton, R. (2006). Real-time data display, spatial visualization ability, and learning force and motion concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0361-0
McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104
Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., Fischer, H.E. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics and Science Education – Why Should We Use Them?. Στο: D. Treagust, R. Duit, H Fischer. (Επιμ.) Multiple Representations in Physics Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, τ. 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1
Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H.E. (2021). Multiple Representations and Learning Physics. Στο: H.E. Fischer, R Girwidz. (Επιμ.) Physics Education. Challenges in Physics Education Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87391-2_7
Planinic, M., Susac, A., Ivanjek, L., Milin Šipuš, Ž. (2019). Comparing Student Understanding of Graphs in Physics and Mathematics. Στο: G. Pospiech, M. Michelini, B.S. Eylon. (Επιμ.) Mathematics in Physics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04627-9_10
Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (χ.χ.). Scimago Journal & Country Rank. Ανακτήθηκε στις 25/6/2025, από: https://www.scimagojr.com
Stefanel, A. (2019). Graph in Physics Education: From Representation to Conceptual Understanding. Στο: G. Pospiech, M. Michelini, B.S. Eylon. (Επιμ.) Mathematics in Physics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04627-9_9