Assessing High school students’ inquiry skills after their engagement in inquiry worksheets


Published: Sep 13, 2024
Keywords:
phases of inquiry electric circuits simple pendulum
Eleni Petridou
Anastasios Molohidis
Euripides Hatzikraniotis
Abstract

This paper presents the development of a teaching learning sequence based on the inquiry-continuum. Students participate in experimental activities using online simulations, with gradually decreasing guidance. The aim of the work is to assess students' ability to apply the phases of inquiry in a subject different from the one in which they were taught. The results show that inquiry skills can be taught even though some students have difficulty implementing all the phases of the inquiry without guidance.

Article Details
  • Section
  • ORAL PRESENTASIONS
Downloads
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in Science Education: International Perspectives. Science Education. 88 (3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46 (2), 26-29. ISSN-0036-8148.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94 (4), 577–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390.
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68 (2), 179–202. https://doi:10.2307/1170753.
Eick, C., Meadows, L., & Balkcom, R. (2005). Breaking into inquiry: Scaffolding supports beginning efforts to implement inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 72 (7), 49–53.
Hackling M. W. (1998). Working Scientifically: Implementing and Assessing Open Investigation Work in Science; Department of Education and Training: Western Australia, ISBN 0-7307-4146-X.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (9), 898–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10115.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli C.C., Zacharias C.Z. & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.
Psillos D., Molohidis A., Kallery M. and Hatzikraniotis E. (2016). The Iterative Evolution of a Teaching Learning Sequence on the Thermal Conductivity of Materials στο Psillos D., Kariotoglou P (Επιμ.): Iterative Design of Teaching – Learning Sequences: Introducing the Science of Materials in European Schools, Springer, ISBN: 978-94-007-7807-5.