Competencies of data analysis and interpretation on an educational Physics experiment by undergraduate students


Πρακτικά Εκτεταμένων Συνόψεων Εργασιών
Published: Sep 24, 2023
Keywords:
Educational experiment Physics education Scientific competencies
Stylianos Kastrinakis
Dimitris Chalkidis
Abstract

Data analysis and interpretation are integral parts of laboratory Physics education. The scientific reports from 30 undergraduate Engineering students about a Classical Mechanics experiment were analysed concerning the practice of relevant inquiry competencies. About one third of them omit main features in graph creation. Moreover, and the conceptualization of experimental errors, and significant figures seem not to be understood to a large extent in depth. It is common not to understand the main purpose of the experiment, since students usually do not answer the initial inquiry question through explicit references to the conceptual theoretical framework.

Article Details
  • Section
  • 13. EXPERIMENTAL TEACHING
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Κουμαράς, Π. (2017). Διδάσκοντας Φυσική αύριο … με στόχο την καλλιέργεια γνώσεων και ικανοτήτων για τη ζωή. Gutenberg, Αθήνα.
Χαλκιά, Κ. (2010). Διδάσκοντας Φυσικές Επιστήμες. Θεωρητικά ζητήματα, προβληματισμοί, προτάσεις (Α΄ Τόμος). Πατάκη, Αθήνα.
Arnold, J. C., Kremer, K., & Mayer, J. (2014). Understanding Students' Experiments - What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks?. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2719-2749.
Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th Edition). Oxford University Press.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
Kanari, Z., & Millar, R. (2004). Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 748-769.
Kok, K., Priemer, B., Musold, W., & Masnick, A. (2019). Students’ conclusions from measurement data: The more decimal places, the better?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010103.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196.
Pols, C. F. J., Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & De Vries, M. J. (2021). What do they know? Investigating students’ ability to analyse experimental data in secondary physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 274-297.
Pols, F., & Diepenbroek, P. (2023). Collaborative data collection: shifting focus on meaning making during practical work. Physics Education, 58(2), 023001.
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.