Exploring the Utilization of ChatGPT for Creating Refutation Texts in Physics Education


Published: Apr 19, 2026
Keywords:
artificial intelligence ChatGPT conceptual change refutation texts
Konstantinos Sofronidis
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4908-8776
Anastasios Zoupidis
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-9451
Dimitris Pnevmatikos
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-2155
Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) in Physics education, focusing on the creation of refutation texts that aid in correcting students' alternative conceptions about natural phenomena. As these conceptions represent a significant and persistent obstacle to learning, refutation texts serve as a strategy that can assist in reconstructing of knowledge. This study examines how ChatGPT can support educators in drafting such texts and systematically explores the capabilities and limitations of this application.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Προφορικές Ανακοινώσεις
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Τζιμώκας, Δ., & Ματθαιουδάκη, Μ. (2014). Δείκτες αναγνωσιμότητας: Ζητήματα εφαρμογής και αξιοπιστίας. Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics: Selective Papers from the 20th International Symposium from Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, τ. 3, 367-383. Ανακτήθηκε στις 25/5/2025 από: https://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/270005/files/Deiktes.pdf
Χαλκιά, Κ., (2012). Διδάσκοντας Φυσικές Επιστήμες. Εκδόσεις Πατάκη. ISBN: 978-960-16-4308-3.
Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977-997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional science, 39, 581-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9142-5
Braasch, J. L., Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2013). The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 561. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032627
Cordova, J. R., Sinatra, G. M., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Confidence in prior knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and prior knowledge: Influences on conceptual change.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.006
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Mouskounti, T., Fella, A., & Ioannides, C. (2016). Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning. Learning and Instruction, 41, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.002
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (2014). Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children's ideas (2η εκδ.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747415
DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. Online submission. Ανακτήθηκε στις 25/5/2025 από: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490073.pdf
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational researcher, 40(5), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11413260
Hynd, C. R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(7-8), 699-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00010-1
Jere, S., Bessong, R., Mpeta, M., & Litshani, N. F. (2024). Pre-service Physical Sciences Teachers’ Views on Integrating ChatGPT into Teaching: A Case Study. Προδημοσίευση, Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4783356/v1
Kendeou, P., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). 16 the knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: processes and mechanisms. Στο Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences, σσ. 353-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 22199-22213. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.11916
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Correcting Students' Misconceptions in Physics Using Experiments Designed by ChatGPT. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(2), 83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(2).07
Lee, G. G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for Science Learning: A Study on Pre-service Teachers' Lesson Planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1643-1660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3401457.
Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7
Peikos G, Stavrou D. (2025). ChatGPT for Science Lesson Planning: An Exploratory Study Based on Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Education Sciences, 15(3), 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030338
Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2024). How understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 025701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad1420
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227. Ανακτήθηκε στις 25/5/2025 από: https://www.fisica.uniud.it/URDF/laurea/idifo1/materiali/g5/Posner%20et%20al.pdf
Sinatra, G. M., & Broughton, S. H. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.005
Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International journal of science and mathematics education, 8, 951-970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar, Α., Spencer-Smith J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11382. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382
Zengilowski, A., Schuetze, B. A., Nash, B. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2021). A critical review of the refutation text literature: Methodological confounds, theoretical problems, and possible solutions. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1861948