Development of In-Service Teachers' STEM Teaching Identity in the Context of Climate Education
Published:
Apr 17, 2026
Keywords:
climate education STEM teaching approach teacher identity
Abstract
This study explores the development of STEM teaching identity among science educators, with a focus on teaching climate change. Thirteen primary and secondary school teachers participated in learning communities, where they designed and implemented STEM teaching units. Data were collected through interviews, reflective journals, and teaching plans. The study highlights shifts in aspects of teaching identity related to knowledge, practices, and beliefs about their role as educators, offering valuable insights into their professional development.
Article Details
- Section
- Προφορικές Ανακοινώσεις
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
Anderson, J., Li, Y. (2020). Investigating the Potential of Integrated STEM Education from an International Perspective. Στο: J. Anderson, Y. Li (Επιμ.) Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Advances in STEM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_1
Avraamidou, L. (2014). Tracing a Beginning Elementary Teacher’s Development of Identity for Science Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113519476
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2011). New teachers’ identity shifts at the boundary of teacher education and initial practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.003
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Chen, J. L., & Mensah, F. M. (2018). Teaching contexts that influence elementary preservice teachers’ teacher and science teacher identity development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(5), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469187
Eilam, E. (2022). Climate change education: the problem with walking away from disciplines. Studies in Science Education, 58(2), 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.2011589
Ennes, M., Lawson, D. F., Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., & Jones, M. G. (2021). It’s about time: perceived barriers to in-service teacher climate change professional development. Environmental Education Research, 27(5), 762-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1909708
Gunersel, A. B., Kaplan, A., Barnett, P., Etienne, M., & Ponnock, A. R. (2016). Profiles of change in motivation for teaching in higher education at an American research university. Teaching in higher education, 21(6), 628-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1163668
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. A. (Επιμ.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Core Writing Team, H. Lee, & J. Romero, Επιμ.). IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental psychology, 53(11), 2036. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000339
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Lehtonen, A., Salonen, A. O., & Cantell, H. (2019). Climate change education: A new approach for a world of wicked problems. Στο J. W. Cook (Επιμ.) Sustainability, Human Well-Being, and the Future of Education, σσ. 339-374. Palgrave Macmillan https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78580-6_11
Mandrikas, A., & Stefanidou, C. (2025). Greek primary teachers’ views about STEM education. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/16162
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1069
Moshou, H., & Drinia, H. (2023). Climate change education and preparedness of future teachers—A review: The case of Greece. Sustainability, 15(2), 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021177
Ring, E. A., Dare, E. A., Crotty, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2017). The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 444-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1356671
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International journal of STEM education, 4, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
