Systematic Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) via Chatbots in Physics, Mathematics, Language and Social Studies


Published: Apr 6, 2025
Keywords:
Chatbot AI Primary school Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP)
Effransia Tzagkaraki
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-9166
Stamatios Papadakis
Michail Kalogiannakis
Abstract

The review presents current trends in using Chatbots based on Natural Language Processing (NLP - Neuro-Linguistic Programming) in primary education. It analyzes their use in Physics, Mathematics, Language, and Social Studies. Potential challenges regarding the accuracy of information, acceptance by teachers, learners, and parents, and the ethical dimensions of their use in the educational context are presented. The findings indicate that Chatbots can support the educational process without replacing the human factor.

Article Details
  • Section
  • 14th Panhellenic Conference of Didactics in Science Education
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aravantinos, S., Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Karalis, T., & Komis, V. (2024). Educational approaches with AI in primary school settings: A systematic review of the literature available in Scopus. Education Sciences, 14(7), 744. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070744
Beyer, S. & Arndt, K. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions of a Chatbot’s Role in School-based Professional Learning. Open Education Studies, 6(1), 20240015. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0015
Butler, A., Hall, H., & Copnell, B. (2016). A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 13(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12134
Chaves, A. P., Egbert, J., Hocking, T., Doerry, E., & Gerosa, M. A. (2022). Chatbots language design: The influence of language variation on user experience with tourist assistant chatbots. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29(2), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487193
Fokides, E., & Peristeraki, E. (2024). Comparing ChatGPT's correction and feedback comments with that of educators in the context of primary students' short essays written in English and Greek. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12912-8
Han, A., Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Han, S., Ko, R., Corrigan, S., & Peppler, K. A. (2024). Teachers, Parents, and Students' perspectives on Integrating Generative AI into Elementary Literacy Education. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '24), 678, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642438
Karaman, M.R. & Goksu, I. (2024). Are lesson plans created by ChatGPT more effective? An experimental study. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 7(1), 107- 127. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.607
Koltsakis, E., Klontzas, M.E., & Karantanas, A.H. (2023). What Is Artificial Intelligence: History and Basic Definitions. In: Klontzas, M.E., Fanni, S.C., Neri, E. (eds) Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Imaging Informatics for Healthcare Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25928-9_1
Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yang, X., Li, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 Level: An extension of the classic TAM model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64363-3
Rong, W., & Yu, Z. (2023). Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 55, 10-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13334
Stryftoy, S., Krouska, A., Troussas, C., Mylonas, P., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024). Exploring teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy towards AI learning in science instruction. In 4th International Conference on Novel & Intelligent Digital Systems (NiDS 2024), September 25-27, 2024, Athens, Greece. http://www.image.ece.ntua.gr/publications.php
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Tiranant, P., Boonyakitanont, P., & Jinowat, N. (2024). Designing chatbots in language classrooms: An empirical investigation from user learning experience. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00319-4