Sciences and Technologies in Educators' "Visions" for our Future
Published:
Apr 6, 2025
Keywords:
representation vs intervention climate change social & personal approach science & technology approach
Abstract
For more than fifteen years, mainstream science education (SE) internationally has been plagued by a peculiar assumption related to its design. This assumption says that optimal educational goals today can and should be guided by scientific and technological visions of avoiding a dystopian and at the same time not exactly predictable future. In this paper, we attempt to record the “visions” of today’s teachers for their lives in this future, arguing that these erect a constructive cultural barrier to the reception of proposals that attempt to transform it, through SE. The first results tend to confirm our hypothesis.
Article Details
- Section
- 14th Panhellenic Conference of Didactics in Science Education
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Τσελφές, Β. (2005). Η εκπαιδευτική δέσμευση και το «παιχνίδι» της νέας γνώσης: Πόσο ελεύθερος μπορεί να είναι ο δάσκαλος των φυσικών επιστημών; Στο Κ. Βρατσάλης (Επιμ), Διδακτική εμπειρία και παιδαγωγική θεωρία. Αθήνα: Νήσος, 157-174, ISBN: 960-87489-6-8
Τσελφές, Β & Παρούση, Α. (2015). Θέατρο και Επιστήμη στην Εκπαίδευση. [ηλεκτρ. βιβλ.] Αθήνα: Σύνδεσμος Ελληνικών Ακαδημαϊκών Βιβλιοθηκών. Διαθέσιμο στο: http://hdl.handle.net/11419/4042 (προσπέλαση: 16-02-2025).
Τσελφές, Β. & Παρούση, Α. (2020). H προσέγγιση του «εαυτού» μέσα σε μελλοντικές «μορφές ζωής», όπως τις προβλέπουν τεχνολογικές-επιστημονικές θεωρήσεις. Στο Κ. Πλακίτση, κ. ά. (επιμ), 11ο Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο. Οι Φυσικές Επιστήμες στην Προσχολική Εκπαίδευση, 14-28, ΠΤΝ, ΠΙ, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365183720_11o_Panellenio_Synedrio_Oi_Physikes_Epistemes_sten_Proscholike_Ekpaideuse_Chartographontas_te_nea_eikosaetia_ereunas_kai_didaktikes_praxes_PRAKTIKA_E-BOOK (προσπέλαση: 16-02-2025).
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U. and Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp. The European sustainability competence framework. Punie, Y. and Bacigalupo, M. editor(s), EUR 30955 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-76-46485-3, doi:10.2760/13286, JRC128040.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind. ΝΥ:McGraw-Hill (3ed ed), ISBN: 978-0-07-177015-6
Norris, S., Guilbert, S., Smith, M., Hakimelahi, L. & Phillips, L. (2005). A Theoretical Framework for Narrative Explanation in Science. Science Education, 89, 535–563, https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
OECD (2022), Climate Tipping Points: Insights for Effective Policy Action, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/abc5a69e-en
Rayner, S. (2012) Uncomfortable knowledge: the social construction of ignorance in science and environmental policy discourses, Economy and Society, 41:1, 107-125, DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2011.637335
Wessels, K. R. (2022). Pedagogy of Entanglement. A Response to the Complex Societal Challenges that Permeate our Lives. Switzerland: Springer Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15787-5