Prompt Engineering: Maximizing ChatGPT's potential in science education
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence and especially Large Language Models (LLM), such as ChatGPT has revolutionized the way educators work. The results we get from LLMs depend on how we ask them to help us. The process and the technique behind an effective input is called prompt engineering. The aim of this study is to investigate whether science educators in secondary education improve their attitude toward ChatGPT as a learning assistant after an appropriate training in prompt engineering. The results of the pilot study presented in this paper show an improvement in the previously mentioned teachers' perceptions.
Article Details
- Section
- 14th Panhellenic Conference of Didactics in Science Education
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Beege, M., Hug, C., & Nerb, J. (2024). The Effect of Teachers Beliefs and Experiences on the Use of ChatGPT in STEM Disciplines. Available at SSRN 4811286.
Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430.
Forero, M. G., & Herrera-Suárez, H. J. (2023). ChatGPT in the Classroom: Boon or Bane for Physics Students' Academic Performance?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02422.
Gousopoulos, D. (2024). Educational Approach of Special Relativity using a custom GPT as a teaching assistant. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(4).
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence helps primary school teachers to plan and execute physics classroom experiments. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(2).
Leung, C. H. (2024). Promoting optimal learning with ChatGPT: A comprehensive exploration of prompt engineering in education. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(2), 104-114.
Mahligawati, F., Allanas, E., Butarbutar, M. H., & Nordin, N. A. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in Physics Education: a comprehensive literature review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2596, No. 1, p. 012080). IOP Publishing.
Mustofa, H. A., Bilad, M. R., & Grendis, N. W. B. (2024). Utilizing AI for Physics Problem Solving: A Literature Review and ChatGPT Experience. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 12(1).
Nazaretsky, T., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022, March). An instrument for measuring teachers’ trust in AI-based educational technology. In LAK22: 12th international learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 56-66).
Schmidt, D. C., Spencer-Smith, J., Fu, Q., & White, J. (2024). Towards a catalog of prompt patterns to enhance the discipline of prompt engineering. ACM SIGAda Ada Letters, 43(2), 43-51.
Velásquez-Henao, J. D., Franco-Cardona, C. J., & Cadavid-Higuita, L. (2023). Prompt Engineering: a methodology for optimizing interactions with AI-Language Models in the field of engineering. Dyna, 90(230), 9-17.
Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2024). The impact of AI in physics education: a comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels. Physics Education, 59(2), 025010.