AI-Integrated Science Education & Literacies: The Greek Chatbot Talos

PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: May 12, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/codiste.10009
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
artificial intelligence, chatbot, science education, scientific literacy, writing
Ioannis Lefkos
University of Macedonia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-4588
Maria Mitsiaki
Democritus University of Thrace
Apostolos Siokas
Secondary Education
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0692-3526
Περίληψη

In this paper, we present the development of Talos, a customised chatbot using the AI Power plugin, on an educational platform to support students in basic education in writing scientific texts. The customisation involves simplifying the language, providing a student-friendly response style and age-sensitive texts. Talos acts as an educational tool, a facilitator, an expert and a friend in a targeted effort to develop scientific literacy in a personalised way. In addition, a discussion follows of the opportunities and challenges that emerge during the testing phase of Talos.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • Προφορικές Ανακοινώσεις
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Aguilar-Mejía, J. R., Tejeda, S., Ramirez-Lopez, C. V., & Garay-Rondero, C. L. (2022). Design and use of a chatbot for learning selected topics of physics. In S. Hosseini et al. (Eds.), Technology-Enabled Innovations in Education (pp. 175–188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3383-7_13
Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54, 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
Christie, F. & Derewianka, B. M. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. Continuum. ISBN 978-1-4411-3131-7.
Dahlkemper, M. N., Lahme, S. Z., & Klein, P. (2023). How do physics students evaluate artificial intelligence responses on comprehension questions? A study on the perceived scientific accuracy and linguistic quality of ChatGPT. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, 010142. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010142
Gee J.P. (2015). Literacy and education. Routledge. ISBN: 978-1-315-73957-1.
Heeg, D. M., & Avraamidou, L. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in school science: A systematic literature review. Educational Media International, 60(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2023.2264990
Humburg, M., Hong, D., Zhou, M., Feng, C., Danish, J., Hmelo-Silver, C., Wang, T., Glazewski, K., Kim, Y. J., Kumaran, V., & Lester, J. (2025). Using AI-driven conversational agents to support student-led collaborative scientific inquiry. In CSCL 2025 Proceedings (pp. 551–554). ISLS.
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Guerra, A. G. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT in school children’s education: Evidence from a school lesson. Sustainability, 15, 14025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151814025
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2025). Literacy in the Time of Artificial Intelligence. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(1), e591. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.591
Kim, W. J. (2022). AI-integrated science teaching through facilitating epistemic discourse in the classroom. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 8(1), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10041
Lee, H.-S., Gweon, G.-H., Lord, T., Paessel, N., Pallant, A., & Pryputniewicz, S. (2021). Machine learning-enabled automated feedback: Supporting students’ revision of scientific arguments based on data drawn from simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09889-7
Lee, J., An, T., Chu, H.-E., Hong, H.-G., & Martin, S. N. (2023). Improving science conceptual understanding and attitudes in elementary science classes through the development and application of a rule-based AI chatbot. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 9, 365–412. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10070
Lefkos, I. & Mitsiaki, M. (2021). Users’ preferences for pedagogical e-Content: A utility/usability survey on the Greek Illustrated Science Dictionary for School. In S. Demetriadis, T. Tsiatsos, T. Mikropoulos & V. Dagdilelis (Eds.), Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 197-217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64363-8_11
Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Retrieved December 9, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literate.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning–mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, revised edition. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
Polverini, G., & Gregorcic, B. (2024). How understanding large language models can inform the use of ChatGPT in physics education. European Journal of Physics, 45(2), 025701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad1420
Siarova, H., Sternadel, D. & Szőnyi, E. (2019). Research for CULT Committee – Science and Scientific Literacy as an Educational Challenge. European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies. Brussels. Accessed, December 9, 2025, from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/629188/IPOL_STU(2019)629188_EN.pdf
Stornaiuolo, A., Higgs, J., Nichols, T. P., Leblanc, R. J., & de Roock, R. S. (2023). The platformization of writing instruction: considering educational equity in new learning ecologies. Review of Research in Education, 47(1), 311–359. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X241227431
Topal, A. D., Eren, C. D., & Geçer, A. K. (2021). Chatbot application in a 5th grade science course. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6241–6265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10627-8
Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press. ISBN 0 335 20604 2.
Yim, I. H. Y. (2024). A critical review of teaching and learning artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Developing an intelligence-based AI literacy framework for primary school education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100319
Yore, L., (2012). Science Literacy for All: More than a Slogan, Logo, or Rally Flag! In K.C.D., & Tan, Μ. Kim (Eds.), Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research Moving Forward (pp. 5–23). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980- 2_2