Επιστημονικός γραμματισμός: Αξιολόγηση των κινήτρων και πεποιθήσεων των μαθητών Πρωτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης για την Επιστήμη

PDF
Δημοσιευμένα: Σεπ 13, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/codiste.6924
Λέξεις-κλειδιά:
Επιστημονικός γραμματισμός στάσεις κίνητρα
Κωνσταντίνος Τσουμάνης
Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα Δημοτικής Εκπαίδευσης, Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων
Γεώργιος Στύλος
Παιδαγωγικό Τμ΄ήμα Δημοτικής Εκπαίδευσης, Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίωνν
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8036-8427
Κωνσταντίνος Θ. Κώτσης
Παιδαγωγικό Τμήμα Δημοτικής Εκπαίδευσης, Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων
Περίληψη

Η παρούσα εργασία διερευνά το επίπεδο του επιστημονικού γραμματισμού των μαθητών της Πρωτοβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης συναρτήσει της επίδρασης των δημογραφικών παραγόντων στα κίνητρα και τις πεποιθήσεις τους ως προς την επιστήμης. Τα αποτελέσματα δείχνουν ότι τα κορίτσια παρουσιάζουν περισσότερο θετικές στάσεις απέναντι στην επιστήμη. Επίσης δεν παρατηρείται ουσιαστική διαφορά σχετικά με τις στάσεις των μαθητών και την αστικότητα του σχολείου.

Λεπτομέρειες άρθρου
  • Ενότητα
  • ΠΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΑΚΟΙΝΩΣΕΙΣ
Λήψεις
Τα δεδομένα λήψης δεν είναι ακόμη διαθέσιμα.
Αναφορές
Acar, Ö., Türkmen, L., & Bilgin, A. (2015). Examination of Gender Differences on Cognitive and Motivational Factors that Influence 8th Graders’ Science Achievement in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1027-1040. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1372a
Alpaslan, M. M. (2017). The relationship between personal epistemology and self-regulation among Turkish elementary school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 405-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1108277
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2009). Benchmarks for science literacy. Washington, DC: Author. (Original work published 1993)
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company
Bråten, I., Gil, L., Strømsø, H. I., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2009). Personal epistemology across cultures: Exploring Norwegian and Spanish university students’ epistemic beliefs about climate change. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 529-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-009-9097-z
Burns, E. C., Van Bergen, P., Leonard, A., & Amin, Y. (2022). Positive, complicated, distant, and negative: How different teacher‐student relationship profiles relate to students’ science motivation. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12093
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.518644
Chen, J. A., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.10.003
Daher, W., Alfahel, E., & Anabousy, A. (2021). Moderating the Relationship between Student's Gender and Science Motivation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10829
Diana, S., Rachmatulloh, A., & Rahmawati, E. S. (2015). High School Students’ Scientific Literacy Profile Based on Scientific Literacy Assessments (SLA) Instruments. In Proceeding Biology Education Conference: Biology, Science, Enviromental, and Learning (Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 285-291).
Dorfman, B. S., & Fortus, D. (2019). Students' self‐efficacy for science in different school systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 1037-1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21542
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Fausan, M. M., & Pujiastuti, I. P. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Iiterasi Sains Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Instrumen Scientific Literacy Assessment. In Seminar Nasional LP2M UNM (Vol. 2, No. 1).
Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115
Fortus, D., Lin, J., Neumann, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2022). The role of affect in science literacy for all. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2036384
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(4), 378-405.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational psychology review, 13(4), 353-383.
Hofer, B. K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions.
Høigaard, R., Kovač, V. B., Øverby, N. C., & Haugen, T. (2015). Academic self-efficacy mediates the effects of school psychological climate on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000056
Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002
Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146
Hushman, C. J., & Marley, S. C. (2015). Guided instruction improves elementary student learning and self-efficacy in science. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.899958
Kıran, D., & Sungur, S. (2012). Middle school students’ science self-efficacy and its sources: Examination of gender difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 619-630.
Lederman, J. S., & Bartels, S. B. S. (2018). Assessing the Ultimate Goal of Science Education: Scientific Literacy for All!. In Towards Inclusion of All Learners through Science Teacher Education (pp. 277-285). Brill. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368422_030
Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartels, S., and Jimenez, J. (2019). An international collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students' understandings of scientific inquiry: Establishing a baseline. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 486-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21512
Lederman, N. G. (2019). Contextualizing the relationship between nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191- 019-00030-8
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and Learning of Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Capacity through Systematic Research-Based Professional Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 737-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1625572
Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Differentiating the sources of Taiwanese high school students’ multidimensional science learning self-efficacy: An examination of gender differences. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 575-596
McBride, E., Oswald, W. W., Beck, L. A., & Vashlishan Murray, A. (2020). “I'm just not that great at science”: Science self‐efficacy in arts and communication students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(4), 597-622.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
OECD (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world, volume I analysis. Paris: Author
Rachmatullah, A., Diana, S., & Rustaman, N. Y. (2016). Profile of middle school students on scientific literacy achievements by using scientific literacy assessments (SLA). In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1708, No. 1, p. 080008). AIP Publishing LLC.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific Literacy/Science Literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 729-780). Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Rohana, R., Asrial, A., & Zurweni, Z. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Instrumen Scientific Literacy Assessments (SLA). BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 3(2), 176-185.
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Sezgintürk, M., & Sungur, S. (2020). A multidimensional investigation of students’ science self-efficacy: The role of gender. İlkogretim Online-Elementary Education Online, 19(1), 208-218.
Shin, D. D., Lee, M., Ha, J. E., Park, J. H., Ahn, H. S., Son, E., ... & Bong, M. (2019). Science for all: Boosting the science motivation of elementary school students with utility value intervention. Learning and Instruction, 60, 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.003
Usher, E. L., Ford, C. J., Li, C. R., & Weidner, B. L. (2019). Sources of math and science self-efficacy in rural Appalachia: A convergent mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 57, 32-53.
Webb-Williams, J. (2018). Science self-efficacy in the primary classroom: Using mixed methods to investigate sources of self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 939–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0
Wilson, R. T., Watson, E., Kaelin, M., & Huebner, W. (2018). Early preparation and inspiration for STEM careers: Preliminary report of the epidemiology challenge randomized intervention, 2014- 2015. Public Health Reports, 133(1), 64-74.