Το Ενεργειακό Αποτύπωμα και η διερεύνηση του επιπέδου κατανόησής του από μαθητές/τριες της Δευτεροβάθμιας Εκπαίδευσης. Προσπάθεια για εννοιολογική ανάπτυξη και ενεργό συμμετοχή τους στη μείωσή του μέσω διδακτικής παρέμβασης
Published:
Sep 14, 2024
Keywords:
energy footprint (EF) questionnaire image tool secondary school students teaching learning sequence (TLS)
Abstract
The present thesis explores the secondary school students’ understanding about the energy footprint (EF) concept and the effort of their active participation in its reduction, through intervention. In the first survey, 416 students of the urban complex of Thessaloniki participated by using a developed questionnaire with images, depicting everyday products or services. Results indicate that students do not apprehend the EF concept. While in the second, a Teaching- Learning Sequence (TLS) was designed and implemented with a duration of twenty 20 hours, in 80 7th grade students, with the aim of changing their perceptions and practices towards sustainable energy use.
Article Details
- Section
- PhDs
References
Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey, K., Iha, K., Larson, J., & Galli, A. (2013). Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators, 24, 518-533.
Collins, A., Galli, A., Patrizi, N. & Pulselli, F.M. (2018). Learning and teaching sustainability: The contribution of Ecological Footprint calculators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1000-1010.
DeWaters, J. & Powers, S. (2012). Establishing measurement criteria for an energy literacy questionnaire. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44(1), 38-55.
Fang, K., Heijungs, R., & De Snoo, G.R. (2014). Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family. Ecological Indicators, 36, 508-518.
Galli, A., Kitzes, J., Niccolucci, V., Wackernagel, M., Wada, Y., & Marchettini, N. (2012). Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the Ecological Footprint: A focus on China and India. Ecological Indicators, 17, 99-107.
Li, X., Tan, H. & Rackes, A. (2015). Carbon footprint analysis of student behavior for a sustainable university campus in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 97-108.
Li, G. J., Wang, Q, Gu, X. W., Liu, J. X., Ding, Y., & Liang, G. Y. (2008). Application of the componential method for ecological footprint calculation of a Chinese university campus. Ecological Indicators, 8(1), 75-78.
Meheut, M. (2005). Teaching-learning sequences tools for learning and/or research. Research and the Quality of Science Education, 195-207.
Nunes, L. M., Catarino, A., Ribau Teixeira, M., Cuesta E. M. (2013). Framework for the Inter- comparison of Ecological Footprint of Universities. Ecological Indicators, 32, 276-284.
O’Gorman, L., Davis, J. (2013). Ecological Footprinting: Its Potential as a Tool for Change in Preservice Teacher Education. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 779-791.
Patel, J. (2006). Green sky thinking. Environment Business 122, 32 In Sundha P., & U. Melkania Carbon footprinting: a tool for environmental management. (2016) International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology, 9(2), 247-257.
Trappey, A., Trappey, C., Hsiao, C. T., Ou, J. & Chang. C. T. (2011). System dynamics modeling of product carbon footprint life cycles for collaborative green supply chains. International Journal of Computer Intergrated Manufacturing, 25(10), 934-945.
