Suggestions on how to use Europeana for pedagogical purposes in order to promote Europe’s cultural heritage


Giannis Anagnostou
Afroditi Chatziefstratiou
Theodora Peristeri
Timoleon Theofanellis
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine how educators can use Europeana to promote Europe’s cultural heritage. At first we present Europeana and the basic elements regarding media literacy that teachers and students need to know to make a web based project. We then continue by presenting Europeana as an educational tool. Since it is difficult to introduce a new tool to teachers, we offer a general purpose scenario that can be utilized in any subject. This scenario has been tested in class and the students found it interesting. The idea is that the teacher selects the project area and this must involve European history, especially parts of cultural heritage that are included in the Europeana collection. A rough idea about the project is accomplished by students using the English version of Wikipedia. Those two are blended together to make a story using primary material. Students use other sources to support their case. In the process they learn to cite and to create the sources of the material they use, to respect the work of others, to appreciate primary sources and to share material with others.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Articles
References
Baker, F. W. & Zill, K. (2016). Media Literacy: How to Watch the Debates. MiddleWeb, Retrieved from https://www.middleweb.com/32760/media-literacy-how-to-watch-the-debates/
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York, USA: Macmillan Library.
Bransford, J., Brown, A.L. & Cocking RR. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington: National Academy Press.
Chu, K. C. & Leung, D. (2000). Gaining practical skills through scenario-based learning. Flexible learning for a flexible society: In refereed proceedings of the ASET / HERDSA 2000 Joint International Conference, Queensland.
Dang, Q. V. & Ignat, C. L. (2016). Quality Assessment of Wikipedia Articles without Feature Engineering, Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, June 19-23, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Edelson, D. C., Gordon, D. N, & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 392-450.
Fisher, J.H., O’Connor, D., Flexman, A.M., Shapera, S. & Ryerson, C. J. (2016). Accuracy and reliability of internet resources for information on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 194, 218-225.
Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning literature review. Retrieved from https://galileo.org/focus-on-inquiry-lit-review.pdf
Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry Review: Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Presence Issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61-72.
Gray, B. (2004). Informal Learning in an Online Community of Practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20-35.
Hobbs, R. & Jensen, A. (2009). The Past, Present, and Future of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1): 1–17. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jmle/vol1/iss1/1
Jemielniak, D., & Aibar, E. (2016). Bridging the Gap Between Wikipedia and Academia. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1773–1776.
Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How today’s internet is killing our culture. New York: Broadway Business.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1929). The project method. The Use of the Purposeful Act in the Educative Process. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Koukopoulos, Z. & Koukopoulos, D. (2019). Integrating educational theories into a feasible digital environment. Applied Computing and Informatics, 15(1), 19-26.
Lanier, J. (2006). Digital maoism. The hazards of the new online collectivism. The Edge.org. Retrieved from http://edge.org/conversation/digital-maoism-the-hazards-of-the-new-online-collectivism
Lynch, M. (2017). What is media literacy and why does it matter? The tech edvocate, Retrirved from https://www.thetechedvocate.org/media-literacy-matter/
Media Literacy Now (2019). Retrirved from https://medialiteracynow.org/
Ott, M. & Pozzi, F. (2011). Towards a new era for Cultural Heritage Education: Discussing the role of ICT. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1365-1371.
Gaona-Garcia, P. A., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Fermoso García, A. (2017): A premier systematic study. Online Information Review, 41(6), 840-859.
Porcello, D. & Hsi, S. (2013). Crowdsourcing and Curating Online Education Resources. Science 341(6143), 240-241.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Tammaro A.M., Ciancio L., De Rosa R., Pantò E., Nascimbeni F. (2017) Digital Libraries in Open Education: The Italy Case. In: Grana C., Baraldi L. (eds) Digital Libraries and Archives. IRCDL 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 733. Springer, Cham
Taibi, D.; Fulantelli, G.; Dietze, S.; Fetahu, B. A Linked Data approach to evaluate Open Education Resources. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Education and Modern Educational Technologies, Cambridge, MA, USA, 30 January–1 February 2013.
Tenneson, C. (2017). Working towards the 2018 European Year of Cultural Heritage. Retrieved from https://pro.europeana.eu/post/working-towards-the-2018-european-year-of-cultural-heritage.
Truyen, F., Colangelo, C., & Taes, S. (2016). What can Europeana bring to Open Education? In Enhancing European Higher Education "Opportunities and impact of new modes of teaching" OOFHEC2016 Proceedings (pp. 698--704). EADTU.