Conservation of cultural heritage from the perspective of sustainability
Published:
Jun 18, 2024
Keywords:
Conservation sustainability Cultural heritage
Abstract
In recent decades, in a scenario of instability given by resource constraints, environmental crises and climate change, there has been a paradigm shift requiring new, more sustainable models, also involving the field of cultural heritage conservation. A new approach, based on an overall and more comprehensive view of conservation processes, is required, which calls for a re-evaluation of intervention strategies taking into account the different conservation operations and their implications. To this end, many directions are being taken to apply sustainability principles to the environmental, economic and social aspects of cultural heritage conservation.
However, the absence of a recognised definition of sustainability in restoration interventions and the lack of systemic principles to refer to still leaves many questions open in the field of conservation. Considering the aspect related to restoration products, the absence of parameters often leads to the diffusion and misuse of the term ‘sustainable’ in an indistinct semantic boundary where terms referring to ‘green’ and ‘sustainable’ practices alternate, mainly involving the environmental dimension of sustainability in conservation practices.
Starting from a semantic review of sustainability, the study aims to provide an integrated analysis of possible sustainability parameters to be integrated into assessment tools for restoration interventions, with reference to environmental, economic and social aspects, and in consideration of the compatibility, durability and effectiveness aspects of conservation interventions.
Article Details
- How to Cite
-
Bordoni, P. (2024). Conservation of cultural heritage from the perspective of sustainability. International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.12681/monubasin.8335
- Section
- Part VII - Technologies for Damage Rehabilitation and Sustainable Preservation
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
United Nations, Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm (1972).
IUCN, World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, IUCN-UNEP-WWF (1980).
IUCN, Introduction: living resource conservation for sustainable developlllent, in IUCN, World Conservation Strategy…, (op. cit.), IUCN-UNEP-WWF (1980).
WCED, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, London (1987).
IUCN Introduction: living resource conservation for sustainable developlllent, in IUCN, World Conservation Strategy…, (op. cit.), IUCN-UNEP-WWF (1980).
United Nations, Agenda 21. Programme of action for sustainable development, Rio Declaration on Envi-ronment and Development, statement of forest principles, 3-14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, New York (1993).
United Nations, Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, 26 August-4 September 2002, United Nations, New York (2002).
Fairclough G., The ‘S’ word-Sustaining conservation, in Clark K. (ed. by), Conservation Plans in Action, Proceedings of the Oxford Conference, English Heritage, London (1999).
Carlowitz, H.C., Sylvicultura Oeconomica-Anweisung zur wilden Baumzucht; Bey Johann Friedrich Brauns sel. Erben, Leipzig (1713).
Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. DOI: 10.3000/17252555.L_2010.153.eng
Teutonico J.M., Matero F., Managing Change. Sustainable Approaches to the Conservation of the Built Environment, Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles (2003).
Matero F., Prefazione, in Teutonico J.M., Matero F., Managing Change…, (op. cit.), Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles (2003).
Revez M.J., Delgado Rodrigues J., Incompatibility risk assessment procedure for the cleaning of built heritage, J. Cult. Herit, 18, (2016), pp. 219-228.
Rodrigues J.D., Grossi A., Indicators and ratings for the compatibility assessment of conservation actions, J. Cult. Herit, 8, (2007), pp. 32- 43.
Turk J., Mauko Pranjic A., Hursthouse A., et al., Decision support criteria and the development of a decision support tool for the selection of conservation materials for the built cultural heritage, J. Cult. Herit, (2018).
Nijland T.G, Adan O.C., van Hees R.P., van Etten B.D., “Evaluation of the effects of expected climate change on the durability of building materials with suggestions for adaptation”, Heron, 54, (2009), pp. 37-48.
Watt J., Tidblad J., Kucera V., Hamilton R., The Effects of Air Pollution on Cultural Heritage, Springer, Berlin (2009). DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-84893-8
Doehne E., Price C.A., Stone Conservation: an Overview of Current Research, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles (2010).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s Science Inventory, EPA’s Office of Research and Development.
Marin E., Vaccaro C., Leis M., Biotechnology Applied to Historic Stoneworks Conservation. Testing the Potential Harmfulness of two Biological Biocides, Int. J. Conserv. Sci., 7, (2016), pp. 227-239.
Macchia A., Strangis R., De Angelis S., et al., Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs). Preliminary Results for Their Use Such as Biocides in the Building Cultural Heritage, Materials, (2022).
Glavic P., Lukman R., Review of sustainability terms and their definitions, J. Clean. Prod., 15, (2007), pp. 1875-1885. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.12.006
Yanarella E.J., Levine R.S., Lancaster R.W., Green versus Sustainability. From Semantics to Enlightenment, Sustainability, 2, 5, (2009).
Carson, R., Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, New York (1962).
Anastas P.T., Warner J.C., Green Chemistry, Theory and Practice, Oxford University press, New York (1998).
Friedman T.L., Hot, flat, and crowded. Why we need a green revolution and how it can renew America, Farrar, Starus and Giroux, New York (2008).
Yanarella E. J., Levine R. S., Lancaster R. W., Green versus Sustainability…, (op. cit.), Sustainability, 2, 5, (2009).
Friedman T.L., Hot, flat, and crowded…, (op. cit.), Farrar, Starus and Giroux, New York (2008).
McDonough W., Braungart M., Cradle to cradle. Remaking the way we make things, North Point Press, New York (2002).
CEN, EN 16575:2014, Bio-based products-Vocabulary, Brussels, Belgium, (2014).
CEN, EN 16751:2016, Bio-based products-Sustainability criteria, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, (2016).
CEN, Bio-based products-life cycle assessment, EN 16:760 standard, European Committee for Standardization, (2015).
ISO, ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, (2006).
ISO, ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, (2006).
Anand C.K., Amor B., Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings. A critical review, Renewable Sustainable Energy, (2017), pp. 408-416.
CEN, EN 16751:2016, Bio-based products-Sustainability criteria, Brussels, (2016).
European Commission, Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability. Towards a Toxic-Free Environment, Brussels, (2020).
McDonough W., Braungart M., Cradle to cradle…, (op. cit.), North Point Press, New York (2002).
Siegesmund, S., Snethlage, R., Stone in Architecture. Properties, Durability, Springer, Berlin, (2014).
Della Torre S., Riflessioni sul principio di compatibilità. Verso una gestione dell’incompatibilità, in Dalla reversibilità alla compatibilità, Atti del Convegno, Conegliano, 13-14 giugno 2003, Firenze (2003), pp. 27-32.
Gulotta, D., Toniolo, L., Conservation of the Built Heritage. Pilot Site Approach to Design a Sustainable Process. Heritage, 2, (2019), pp. 797-812.
Bonazza A., Maxwell I., Drdácký M., et al., Safeguarding Cultural Heritage from Natural and Man-Made Disasters a Comparative Analysis of Risk Management in the EU, European Union, Brussels, (2018).
