HNPS Advances in Nuclear Physics Banner

Analysis of iPWR SMR behavior during malfunction events

pdf
Published: Feb 24, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12681/hnpsanp.8886
Keywords:
SMR Safety iPWR simulation
Ioannis Kaisas
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0181-5338
Georgios Krezas
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5123-280X
Abstract

Small modular reactors are nuclear reactors with a maximum power capacity of 300 MWe according to IAEA’s classification of nuclear reactors. Advertised for their short installation time, compared to traditional Nuclear Power Plants, and their negligible CO2 emissions, SMRs can act as a complementary power source to a renewable and carbon–free energy production power grid. Due to their low power and their passive safety systems, in case of operation failure, damage is minimized without human intervention. The shut down systems rely on physical phenomena to operate and minimize the risk of radioactivity release. For example, the passive decay heat removal system (PDHR) relies on natural circulation of the coolant, while the gravity driven water injection system (GIS) and the control rod actuation in case of SCRAM event rely on gravity.


This study exploits IAEA’s iPWR simulation to observe the behavior of an SMR during different malfunction events. During malfunction events, different safety systems, such as the PDHR and GIS, are activated, as well as other safety systems such as the automatic depressurization system (ADS) and the pressure injection system (PIS), to prevent further damage. The malfunction events studied are turbine malfunction, loss of feedwater-flow, steam-line break inside containment building, and station blackout. In these scenarios, phenomena such as Xe build-up and decay heat from fission products after shutdown are analyzed. For example, in the loss of feedwater-flow malfunction, Xe reactivity reaches its most negative value of -3445 pcm after approximately 7 hours, while the average coolant temperature stabilizes at 155.5oC after 16 hours. Such results are valuable for the appropriate selection of materials and components of SMRs. Also, this study suggest an improvement in the given SMR design in the blackout malfunction event, in which the SMR cannot cool down properly since the ADS valves are “fail-close” valves and cannot depressurize the system, halting the operation of other safety systems. With suggestion of the "fail-open” design of these valves, this problem could be solved and further damage would be prevented.

Article Details
  • Section
  • Oral contributions
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References
J.Liou. What are Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)? Available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what- are- small- modular-reactors-smrs. Accessed: 2025-10-01.
IAEA. Terms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants. 2023. url: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB2071_Web.pdf
Sang Hee Kang, Sang Won Lee, and Hyun Gook Kang. “Performance analysis of the passive safety features of iPOWER under Fukushima-like accident conditions”. In: Nuclear Engineering and Technology 51.3 (2019), pp. 676–682. issn: 1738-5733. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2018.11.010
Kibeom Park, Tongkyu Park, Sung Kyun Zee, and Bon Seung Koo. “Control rod driven long-term load-follow operation in small modular reactor”. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy 182 (2023), p. 109620. issn: 0306-4549. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109620
J.Lamarsh and A.Baratta. Introduction to Nuclear Engineering. 2001. url: https://www.engr.psu.edu/conedmat/courses/nuce497a/lamarsh_baratta-introduction_to_nuclear_engineering_textbook_3rd_edition.pdf.
Andrew Worrall. “Core and fuel technologies in integral pressurized water reactors (iPWRs)”. In: Handbook of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (Second Edition). Ed. by Daniel T. Ingersoll and Mario D. Carelli. Second Edition. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy
Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 69–93. isbn: 978-0-12-823916-2. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823916-2.00004-7
Yanan Zhao, Minjun Peng, and Genglei Xia. “Safety evaluation of the flashing-driven natural circulation IPWR against Loss-of-Feedwater accident”. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy 142 (2020), p. 107408. issn: 0306-4549. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107408
Zhexi Guo and Sicong Xiao. “Thermal hydraulic study of NuScale iPWR passive containment cooling behaviour during loss-of-coolant accident”. In: International Journal of Advanced Nuclear Reactor Design and Technology 7.2 (2025), pp. 100–109. issn: 2468-6050. doi: 10.1016/j.jandt.2025.05.003
Chireuding Zeliang, Yi Mi, Akira Tokuhiro, Lixuan Lu, and Aleksey Rezvoi. “Integral PWR-Type Small Modular Reactor Developmental Status, Design Characteristics and Passive Features: A Review”. In: Energies 13 (June 2020), p. 2898. doi: 10.3390/en13112898
Bojan Petrovic. “8 - Safety of integral pressurized water reactors (iPWRs)”. In: Handbook of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (Second Edition). Ed. by Daniel T. Ingersoll and Mario D. Carelli. Second Edition. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy. Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 187–215. isbn: 978-0-12-823916-2. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-823916-2.00008-4
Integral Pressurized Water Reactor Simulator Manual. 2017
Vienna (Austria) International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Assessment Section. “Applicability of Design Safety Requirements to Small Modular Reactor Technologies Intended for Near Term Deployment. Light Water Reactors - High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors” In: (2020). issn: 1011-4289. url: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-1936_web.pdf
Guoxu Zhang and Heng Xie. “Comparison and analysis on transient characteristics of integral pressurized water reactors”. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy 104 (2017), pp. 91–102. issn: 0306-4549. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.02.007