Validation of Empirical Formulas for Spallation Residue Production in 0.3A-1.5A GeV 56Fe+p Reactions


HNPS2021 Proceedings Cover
Published: Oct 17, 2022
Keywords:
Nuclear Reactions Spallation reactions Empirical formulas Two-stage model Isotope production
Nikolaos George Nicolis
Theodora-Ilektra Katsigianni
Kostantinos Korakas
Athanasia Miliadou
Diamantis Tasioudis
Abstract
The production of spallation residues in 56Fe+p bombardments is described with empirical parametric formulas often used in cosmic-ray astrophysics, activation studies and isotope production for medical applications. Experimental observables including mass, charge and isotopic distributions are compared with calculations using two versions of the formulas of Rudstam and Silberberg-Tsao and the SPACS formula.  For reference, a comparison is made with the predictions of a two-stage reaction model. Deviation factors obtained in these approaches are reported.
Article Details
  • Section
  • Oral contributions
Author Biography
Nikolaos George Nicolis, Department of Physics The University of Ioannina Ioannina 45110 Greece

Associate Professor

Department of Physics
The University of Ioannina

References
J.-C. David, Eur. Phys. J. A51, 68 (2015)
J. Benlliure, Spallation Reactions in Applied and Fundamental Research, Lect. Notes Phys. 700, 191–238 (2006)
C. Villagrasa-Canton et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 044603 (2007)
G. Rudstam, Z. Naturforschg. 21a 1027 (1966)
R. Silberberg and C.H. Tsao, Astrophys J. Suppl. 25 315 (1973); Astrophys J. Suppl. 25 335 (1973)
C. H. Tsao, R. Silberberg, A. F. Barghouty, L. Sihver, and T. Kanai, Phys. Rev. C 47(3) 1257 (1993)
C. Schmitt, K.-H. Schmidt, and A. Kelic-Heil, Phys. Rev. C 90, 064605 (2014); Erratum, Phys. Rev. C 94, 039901(E) (2016).
Y. Yariv and Z. Fraenkel, Phys. Rev. C 20, 2227 (1979); Phys. Rev. C 24, 488 (1981); Phys. Rev. C 24, 488 (1981)
N.G. Nicolis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 1541 (2008)
N.G. Nicolis, G.A. Souliotis and A. Bonasera, EPJ Web of Conferences 252, 07001 (2021).
Yu. A. Titarenko et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 064612 (2011).