Two body density matrix of model nuclear matter


E. Mavromanatis
Μ. Petraki
J. W. Clark
Abstract

A lowest-cluster-order variational calculation of the half-diagonal two-body density matrix ρ2(r1,r2,r’1) and the corresponding generalized momentum distribution n(p.Q) is performed for three representative models of nuclear matter containing central correlations. Dynamical correlations produce significant deviations from the results for a noninteracting Fermi gas. Calculations axe in progress that include higherorder cluster corrections as well as state-dependent correlations

Article Details
  • Section
  • Oral contributions
References
Β. Frois and C. Papanicolas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part Sci. 37 (1987) 133; D. B. Day et al, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part Sci. 40 (1990) 357.
D. K. A. De Witt Huberts, J. Phys. G16 (1990) 507; D. F. Geesaman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 63 (1989) 734; G. Garino et al., Phys. Rev. C45 (1991) 780; NE. 18 experiment SLAC, under analysis; Letter of Intent SLAC End Station A, Nov. 1991.
A. S. Carroll et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1698; Brookhaven AGS proposal E850, A.S.Carroll and S. Heppelmann, spokespersons.
D. Ashery and J. Schiffer, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part Sci 36 (1986) 207.
Ο. Benhar et al., Phys. Rev. C44 (1991) 2328.
A. Kohama, K. Yazaki and R. Seki, to appear in Nucl. Phys. A.
J. W. Clark and R. N. Silver, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, ed. E. Gadioli (Università degli Studi di Milano, 1988), p. 531 and references therein
C. Ciofi degU Atti, E. Pace and G. Salme, Phys. Rev. C43 (1991) 1155.
A. S. Rinat and W. H. Dickhoff, Phys. Rev. B42 (1990) 10004.
S. Stringali, Phys. Rev. B46 (1992) 2974 and references therein.
E. Feenberg, Theory of Quantum Fluids (Academic Press, New York, 1969).
J. W. Clark and M. L. Ristig, in Momentum Distributions, eds. R. N. Silver and P. E. Sokol (Plenum Press, New York, 1989), p. 39 and references therein.
O. Benhar, A. Fabrocini and S. Fantoni, Nucl. Phys. A50S (1989) 267; Phys. Rev. C41 (1990) R24; and to be published.
B. E. Vonderfecht, W. H. Dickhoff, A. Polls and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. C44 (1991) R1265.
C. Mahaux and R. Sartor, Phys. Rep. 211 (1992) 53.
A. N. Antonov, P. E. Hodgson *nd J. Zh. Petkov, in Nucléon Momentum and Density Distributions in Nuclei, (Clarendon Press, 1988).
(a) H. A. Gersch, L. J. Rodriguez and P. N. Smith, Phys. Rev. AS (1972) 1547; (b) R. N. Silver, Phys. Rev. B38 (1988) 2283; (c) A. S. Rinat, Phys. Rev. B40 (1989) 6625.
M. L. Ristig and J. W. Clark, Phys. Rev. B40 (1989) 4355.
M L. Ristig and J. W. Clark, Phys. Rev. B41 (1990) 8811.
D. M. Ceperley, in Momentum Distributions, eds. by R. N. Silver and P. E. Solol (Plenum, New York, 1989), p. 71.
C. Carraro and S. E. Koonin, Nucl. Phys. A524 (1991) 201; C. Carraro, R. Seki and T. Shoppa, unpublished.
S. Stringali, M. Traini and Ο. Bohigas, Nucl. Phys. A516 (1990) 33.
E. Mavrommatis, M Petraki and J. W. Clark, in Proceedings of the Second Hellenic Symposium on Theoretical Nuclear Physics 1991, eds. M. Anagnostatos, et al. (University of Athens and NCSR Demokritos, 1992), p. 15
We use here Q instead of q of references [18,19]. Notice that β has been also used for the four-momentum transfer.
M L. Ristig and J. W. Clark, Phys. Rev. B14 (1976) 2875.
J. W. Clark, in Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, ed. D. H. Wilkinson (Pergamon, Oxford, 1979), Vol. 2, p. 89.
D. Ceperley, G. V. Chester, and M. H. Kalos, Phys. Rev. B16 (1977) 3081.
V. R. Pandharipande, R. B. Wiringa and B. D. Day, Phys. Lett. BS7 (1975) 205.
M. F. Flynn et al., Nucl. Phys. A427 (1984) 253.
A. Ramos, A. PoUs and W. H. Dickhoff, Nucl. Phys. A503 (1989)
E. MavTommatis and J. W. Clark, in Condensed Matter Theories, ed. V. C. Aguilera-Navarro (Plenum Press, New York, 1990), Vol. 5, p. 97.
S. Fantoni and V. R. Pandharipande Nucl. Phys. A427 (1984) 473.
Notice in Fig. 11 the difference in scale.
M. L. Ristig, W. J. Ter Louw and J. W. Clark, Phys. Rev. C3 (1971) 1501; Phys. Rev. C5 (1972) 695.
V. R. Pandharipande and R. B. Wiringa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 821.